Thursday, May 19, 2016

First of  all, I think that is necessary to think strikes as a way to express not only particular opinions, but collective demands. In that way, I think that university strikes in Chile as high school strikes are mechanisms of expressions that are internally legitimated. I mean, internally because, as a way of expression, it cause different impressions and feelings in population. Anyway, if there are bad opinions and feelings about strikes, I don't see them as a bad thing, because that's the point of striking.

So, I agree with this way of expression, then I participate too. Last year I didn't have the chance to participate always, because I had to work during that time, but now I'm not working so I’m expecting to participate as I would to. As I said, strikes are internally legitimated, not only because it has become a traditional way to express, but also because is a way to disturb the routine of the institutions and the routine of the people related with institutions that seems to be affected with strikes (I mean, institutions like universities, schools, education minister, government, and so on). As a result of that disturb, institutions are obligated to give answers to students demands. I think that the problem is that institutional answers are not always satisfactory because, at the time, there are not true intentions to make structural changes. So, related with that, there are some troubles that appear like losing classes. I think that both things are related because while we are not having classes, we have not the time to think how to recuperate them without the damage of our knowledge. But, in the other hand, there are not responses to our demands or projects that change the structural problems so, even if we recuperate our classes, educational system is still getting worse.


As a conclusion, I think that to resolve that issue (losing classes), is necessary to stop, to strike, everyone and everything, to disturb and interrupt the course of this bad-educational-system and resolve in real terms the structural problems. Then, it would be possibly to restart our classes and have a good (and free) education and will have not to strike anymore. 

Thursday, May 5, 2016

About my presentation today... I talked about Michel Foucault. A philosopher that I really like, and have read a lot, so i choosed him to talk about because I thought that it would be easily. But... the thing is that I hate to speak english in public. I mean, I hate speaking in public in general (english or spanish), but it makes me really nervous to speak in english. I think that it may be really funny to see me when I'm speaking, because I blush so fast and so red, hahah. Also, i think i speak in english like Slavoj Zizek (a Yugoslavian philosopher that speak in english with a funny accent. Here is a video of him if you wanna know how he speak: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/video/2014/dec/03/slavoj-zizek-philosopher-what-is-freedom-today-video). Anyway, it was a short presentation so I didn't suffer too much.
That's all. Hope you're all ok. Regards